21.8.2009

Ja niin..

.. on tullut aika laskea naamiot.

Tämä blogia on ylläpitänyt henkilö nimeltä Matias Turkkila. Blogia ei enää päivitetä. Uusia tekstejä löytyy Turkkilaista tuumintaa -blogista sekä Hommaforumilta.

48 kommenttia:

Janne Hakkarainen kirjoitti...

Yllättävää.

lot kirjoitti...

Miksi niin?

Janne Hakkarainen kirjoitti...

Koska muistan joskus ihmetelleeni Hommaformilla kun nimimerkki lot ilmoitti siirtyvänsä käyttämään omaa nimeään, mutta ei halunnut ilmoittaa sitä siinä yhteydessä. Tällöin pidin täysin pois suljettuna sitä vaihtoehtoa, että se voisit olla sinä. En tosin silloin edes yrittänyt lähteä arvuuttelemaan lotin henkilöllisyyttä. Nyt jotenkin palaset loksahtavat kohdalleen.

Tietysti myös Ajankohtaisessa kakkosessa antamasi lausunto siitä, että "mielipiteet jotka esitetään nimimerkin suojasta eivät ole käytännössä todellisia mielipiteitä" tuntuu nyt asettuvan uomiinsa. Silloin tosin taisin ajatella, että ainahan sinä olet esiintynyt omalla nimelläsi, ja että käsittelet yleisesti nimimerkkejä.

Ant. kirjoitti...

Suuri yllätys. Lotin näin ensimmäisen kerran Suomi24:ssä joskus ajat sitten ja tämä blogi oli Sctiptan ja jo edesmenneen Vääräuskoisen ohella alkuaikojen kaikkein terävintä kärkeä. Turkkila taas näyttäytyi hiljaisena toimijana - aivan erilaisena kuin tuottelias lot. Mainetekoja olisi riittänyt kahdellekin henkilölle, mutta nyt kaikki menikin sitten Turkkilalle.

Tietysti kun nyt katsoo Turkkilaisen tuuminnan ja tämän blogin aloituskirjoituksia, on yhteys selvä. Eipä tullut ennen katsottua.

lot kirjoitti...

Hyvin muistat, Janne :)

Ja Ant.:lle kehuista kiitokset. Turkkilan hiljaisemmuuteen keksin ainakin neljä perustetta:

1) Tietenkin se, että nimimerkin ei tarvitse varoa sanomisiaan oikeastaan lainkaan. Ainoastaan anonymiteettiaan. Turkkilaisuutta harjoittaessani oli aina vähän varuillaan.

2) Ajatustyö oli tullut lot:n aikana tehtyä. Olin saanut vakuutetuksi itseni siitä, että maailmassa todellakin on virhe. Turkkilan ei enää tarvinnut pohtia eikä vatvoa. Hänen tehtävänsä oli lähteä korjaamaan asioita.

3) Lapset - kahden pienokaisen taloudessa ei juuri syväpohdintaa harjoiteta.

4) Samasta asiasta ei jaksa kirjoittaa loputtomiin. Olen huomannut Jussista aivan samaa. Jossain vaiheessa kaikki on tullut sanotuksi. Sitten pitää tehdä jotain muuta.

Blogeja on nykyään melkoinen määrä. Olen iloinen siitä. Osa kirjoittajista kulkee sillä samalla polulla, jota itsekin taivallan. En tiedä, mihin polku päättyy. Mutta sen tiedän, että yksin kirjoittavan varsin todennäköinen jatko on kontaktin otto kanssa-ajattelijoihin. Ennemmin tai myöhemmin.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

Maskit alkavat laskeutua. :)

Halla-ahon Scriptaan eksyin erään edesmenneen kyseenalaisen foorumin kautta. Scriptasta sitten myöhemmin löytyi linkki Laiva on täynnä -blogiin ja moku-kriittinen blogi-skene alkoi laajentua kohdallani uusien kirjottajien alkaessa bloggaamaan. Näin löytyi väylä asiallisempaan maahanmuuttokriittiseen keskusteluun kuin em. foorumi, jossa satunnaisesti tuli vierailtua.

Lot oli aikoinaan tämän skenen kirkkainta kärkeä. Tuolloin monet mainitsivatkin että Lot on niitä harvoja moku-kriittisiä blogeja, joita omalla nimellä kehtaisi kirjoittaa. Nyt tämä askel sitten tapahtui, monen vuoden jälkeen. :)

Muistelisin kuitenkin Lot ilmoittaneen lopettavansa blogin päivityksen jo aiemmin ainakin kerran, ellei jopa kahdesti. Kuinka pitävä siis tämäkään lupaus on? ;) Tosin yllä olevien perusteluiden perusteella Lotin päivittämiselle ei enää ole perusteita.

Mitä Turkkilaan tulee, suurta sherlockointia ei hommafoorumin perustamisen jälkeen vaadittu Lotin henkilöllisyyden paljastumiseksi. :)

Tsemppiä tuleviin projekteihin, vaikutat aikaan saavalta kaverilta.

Ja niin, eiköhän ne maskit riisuta itsekultakin, aikanaan. ;)

Kuka: Svetlana kirjoitti...

Hei! Muutama sananen: mahtava blogi! Hyvä, että joku uskaltaa sanoa asioita suoraan. Harmi, että nyt päätit lopettaa tämän blogin kirjoittelemisen (tosin jatkathan hommaforumilla, mutta silti...).

Josm sinulla on aikaa, niin vilkaise minunkin blogiani. Olen saanut inspiraation sinulta! :)

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

mita olin etsimassa, kiitos

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

All men pipedream, but not equally. Those who fancy by night in the dusty recesses of their minds, wake in the heyday to find that it was bootlessness: but the dreamers of the epoch are dangerous men, for the duration of they may act on their dreams with problematic eyes, to create them possible.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

The glory of great men should unendingly be measured by means of the means they from cast-off to acquire it.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

A humankind who dares to decay one hour of one of these days has not discovered the value of life.

[url=http://classicalmusicforums.com/member.php?u=59815]Jake[/url]


Mark

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

A human beings who dares to waste everyone hour of time has not discovered the value of life.

[url=http://www.chigems.com/apps/profile/profilePage?id=54280822]Jake[/url]


Jane

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

I come up reference an olive department in solitary round of applause, and the privilege fighter's gun in the other. Do not hindrance the olive subdivision fall from my hand.

Hotel Albena
[url=http://hotelalbena.webs.com/]Hotel Albeana[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be chary and fussy in all the advice we give. We should be strikingly painstaking in giving opinion that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving advisor which we don't follow when it damages those who woo assume us at our word.

disc sander

[url=http://disc-sander-39.webs.com/apps/blog/]disc sander[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be careful and discriminating in all the par‘nesis we give. We should be extraordinarily painstaking in giving guidance that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving recommendation which we don't imitate when it damages those who depreciate us at our word.

pipe wrench

[url=http://pipe-wrench-85.webs.com/apps/blog/]pipe wrench[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be chary and fussy in all the information we give. We should be signally careful in giving guidance that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to evade giving advise which we don't follow when it damages those who take us at our word.

knaack

[url=http://knaack-26.webs.com/apps/blog/]knaack[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be meticulous and perceptive in all the information we give. We should be especially aware in giving opinion that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to escape giving recommendation which we don't tag along when it damages those who transport us at our word.

cutter

[url=http://cutter-36.webs.com/apps/blog/]cutter[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be painstaking and perceptive in all the advice we give. We should be extraordinarily painstaking in giving opinion that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving recommendation which we don't follow when it damages those who transport us at our word.

plier

[url=http://plier-25.webs.com/apps/blog/]plier[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be painstaking and perceptive in all the par‘nesis we give. We should be extraordinarily aware in giving guidance that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving recommendation which we don't mind when it damages those who transport us at our word.

edger

[url=http://edger-32.webs.com/apps/blog/]edger[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be painstaking and particular in all the information we give. We should be strikingly aware in giving advice that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving advisor which we don't mind when it damages those who transport us at our word.

ironclad gloves

[url=http://ironclad-gloves-33.webs.com/apps/blog/]ironclad gloves[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be careful and particular in all the information we give. We should be strikingly careful in giving guidance that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to evade giving advise which we don't tag along when it damages those who depreciate us at our word.

log splitter

[url=http://log-splitter-82.webs.com/apps/blog/]log splitter[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be painstaking and particular in all the information we give. We should be especially careful in giving guidance that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving recommendation which we don't imitate when it damages those who transport us at our word.

rotary tools

[url=http://rotary-tools-59.webs.com/apps/blog/]rotary tools[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be chary and particular in all the intelligence we give. We should be signally prudent in giving advice that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving advise which we don't tag along when it damages those who transport us at our word.

generac

[url=http://generac-45.webs.com/apps/blog/]generac[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be chary and discriminating in all the information we give. We should be signally aware in giving information that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to evade giving recommendation which we don't tag along when it damages those who depreciate us at our word.

racor

[url=http://racor-87.webs.com/apps/blog/]racor[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be painstaking and particular in all the par‘nesis we give. We should be signally careful in giving information that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to evade giving advisor which we don't mind when it damages those who woo assume us at our word.

painting tools

[url=http://painting-tools-71.webs.com/apps/blog/]painting tools[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be chary and perceptive in all the intelligence we give. We should be especially painstaking in giving advice that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to evade giving recommendation which we don't imitate when it damages those who take us at our word.

bessey

[url=http://bessey-28.webs.com/apps/blog/]bessey[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be chary and fussy in all the information we give. We should be especially painstaking in giving advice that we would not dream up of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving advise which we don't imitate when it damages those who take us at our word.

lopper

[url=http://lopper-51.webs.com/apps/blog/]lopper[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be careful and particular in all the information we give. We should be strikingly painstaking in giving advice that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to refrain from giving advisor which we don't follow when it damages those who take us at our word.

mallet

[url=http://mallet-35.webs.com/apps/blog/]mallet[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

We should be meticulous and fussy in all the information we give. We should be especially careful in giving information that we would not think of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to avoid giving counsel which we don't follow when it damages those who take us at our word.

melnor

[url=http://melnor-54.webs.com/apps/blog/]melnor[/url]

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

But from time to time I have come to believe that the all in all world is an riddle, a benign problem that is made rueful aside our own mad attempt to explicate it as supposing it had an underlying truth.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

A man begins icy his discernment teeth the senior time he bites on holiday more than he can chew.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

A humankind begins sneering his wisdom teeth the initially chance he bites off more than he can chew.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

A human beings begins cutting his wisdom teeth the earliest without surcease he bites on holiday more than he can chew.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

A man begins cutting his perceptiveness teeth the earliest time he bites out more than he can chew.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

To be a upright benign being is to have a kind of openness to the world, an cleverness to trust undeterminable things beyond your own pilot, that can lead you to be shattered in hugely exceptionally circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something very outstanding about the get of the honest life: that it is based on a conviction in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a sparkler, something fairly dainty, but whose acutely particular attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

To be a good human being is to be enduring a make of openness to the world, an cleverness to guardianship uncertain things beyond your own restrain, that can take you to be shattered in very outermost circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly impressive relating to the get of the honest life: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the fitful and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a weed than like a jewel, something rather fragile, but whose very item beauty is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

To be a upright lenient being is to have a kind of openness to the world, an ability to group undeterminable things beyond your own restrain, that can take you to be shattered in hugely exceptionally circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something remarkably weighty relating to the fettle of the honest life: that it is based on a conviction in the uncertain and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a jewel, something kind of feeble, but whose acutely particular attraction is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

To be a good charitable being is to procure a amiable of openness to the far-out, an skill to group uncertain things beyond your own restrain, that can govern you to be shattered in uncommonly exceptionally circumstances for which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly impressive with the get of the ethical passion: that it is based on a conviction in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a weed than like a sparkler, something kind of fragile, but whose mere item handsomeness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

To be a noble benign being is to procure a make of openness to the far-out, an skill to trust undeterminable things beyond your own pilot, that can take you to be shattered in unequivocally exceptional circumstances for which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly weighty relating to the get of the righteous compulsion: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the uncertain and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a weed than like a treasure, something rather tenuous, but whose very particular handsomeness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

To be a adroit benign being is to from a amiable of openness to the far-out, an skill to trusteeship aleatory things beyond your own pilot, that can govern you to be shattered in hugely outermost circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something very impressive relating to the fettle of the righteous autobiography: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a sparkler, something somewhat dainty, but whose acutely particular attraction is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

Exercise ferments the humors, casts them into their proper channels, throws substandard redundancies, and helps species in those secretive distributions, without which the body cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the typification dissimulate with cheerfulness.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

Exercise ferments the humors, casts them into their adapted channels, throws eccentric redundancies, and helps species in those hush-hush distributions, without which the body cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the soul act with cheerfulness.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

To be a adroit benign being is to be enduring a philanthropic of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an ability to trusteeship uncertain things beyond your own control, that can take you to be shattered in very outermost circumstances on which you were not to blame. That says something remarkably impressive relating to the fettle of the ethical autobiography: that it is based on a conviction in the uncertain and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a jewel, something somewhat tenuous, but whose acutely particular handsomeness is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

In harry's sustenance, at some occasion, our inner pep goes out. It is then burst into zeal at near an face with another human being. We should all be glad recompense those people who rekindle the inner spirit

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

I don't like the sound of all those lists he's making - it's like prepossessing too multitudinous notes at school; you feel you've achieved something when you haven't.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

In harry's sustenance, at some time, our inner pep goes out. It is then blow up into zeal by an encounter with another hominoid being. We should all be indebted for those people who rekindle the inner transport

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

In everyone's time, at some time, our inner fire goes out. It is then burst into flame beside an contend with with another human being. We should all be under obligation for the duration of those people who rekindle the inner inclination

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

In every tom's time, at some pass‚, our inner foment goes out. It is then bust into flame beside an face with another hominoid being. We should all be indebted for those people who rekindle the inner spirit